UCM buildingSMART International Logo
  • No results found
  • Use cases
  • Co-Creation Space
  • Community
    • buildingSMART
      • buildingSMART International
      • buildingSMART Austria
      • buildingSMART Benelux
      • buildingSMART Germany
      • buildingSMART Switzerland
    • Organizations
      • HSLU
    • Collaboration Partners
      • Companies
      • Associations & Institutions
      • Experts
  • en
    • en
    • de
    • fr
  • Login
Location
buildingSMART Switzerland Andreasstrasse 5 8050 Zurich (Switzerland)ucm@buildingsmart.ch
Company
HomeAbout usCommunityTraining
Resources
Use casesCo-creation spaceRelease notesFAQ
buildingSMART Logo
Copyright © 2025 buildingSMART. All rights reserved.
v5.0.0ContactPrivacy and Cookie StatementTerms and Conditions
Small IconAI Chat

    Evacuation Analysis - RIBA

    Comments

    Loading comments...

    NOT REGISTERED YET?


    Register for the Use Case Management Service for free to start creating your first use case.


    Registered users can use the download area and the comment functions.

    Evacuation Analysis - RIBA
    Document Type
    Use Case
    GUID
    CCEB0BA5-0E8F-4CA2-80E5-B6CF856BA003
    Identifier
    OMA-EVAC-RIBA
    Life Cycle Stage
    RIBA - plan of work
    Revision
    V1.2.0
    Project Status
    Approved
    Maturity Level
    Example
    Published on
    Dec 6, 2021
    Last Change
    Nov 4, 2024
    Publisher
    buildingSMART International
    Authors
    • Angelika Kneidl
    • Asim Siddiqui
    • Jimmy Abualdenien
    • Peter Lawrence
    • Peter Thompson
    • Timo Lehtoviita
    Home
    Use cases
    Evacuation Analysis - RIBA

    Use Case Document Definition

    Exchange Requirements

    Imprint

    Project Group

    • Jimmy Abualdenien (Technical University of Munich (TUM))
    • Angelika Kneidl (accu:rate GmbH)
    • Rainer Könnecke (IST GmbH)
    • Peter Lawrence (University of Greenwich)
    • Timo Lehtoviita (LAB University of Applied Sciences)
    • Asim Siddiqui (University of Greenwich)
    • Peter Thompson (Autodesk)

    Copyright

    All dokuments are licensed as a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (Attribution-Non-Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0). Further information can be found at

    creativecommons

    Handling

    The documents reflect the current best practice and do not claim to be complete. They should not to be understood in the sense of a generally valid recommendation or guideline from a legal point of view. The documents are intended to support appointing and appointed parties in the application of the BIM method. The documents must be adapted to the specific project requirements in each case. The examples listed do not claim to be complete. Its information is based on findings from practical experience and is accordingly to be understood as best practice and not universally applicable. Since we are in a phase in which definitions are only emerging, the publisher cannot guarantee the correctness of individual contents.

    Management Summary

    To meet the UK building fire safety requirements, either a prescriptive or performance-based fire analysis approach is required. For the performance-based analysis, also known as Fire Safety Engineering approach, pedestrian modelling tools can be used to determine the Required Safe Egress Time (RSET). The RSET value is then compared to the Available Safe Egress Time (ASET) value which is often determined using a fire modelling tool. This use case uses the stages specified in the UK Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) guidelines to develop a process map that includes proposed openBIM based data sharing.

    Description

    The normal practice in relation to fire safety in buildings is to apply a prescriptive approach. However, for more complex buildings, the prescriptive rules are not always applicable. Therefore, a performance-based approach is used, which utilises either hand calculations or computer model simulations to determine evacuation times and possible bottlenecks in the building's design. For a given scenario, performance-based analysis has to determine the Available Safe Egress Time (ASET), which needs to be greater than the Required Safe Egress Time (RSET) plus a suitable safety margin.

    • ASET (commonly determined by the time required for certain fire parameters to reach identified critical life safety conditions) is driven by the fire development and determined by a fire simulation.
    • RSET (commonly defined as the time required to complete the evacuation) is driven by human behaviour and often determined by an evacuation simulation. 

    Another approach is to use coupled fire and evacuation analysis, where the impact of fire hazards on the population is directly taken into consideration during the evacuation simulation and so RSET and ASET values are not explicitly determined. Although this approach is less common, it can provide more realistic results. 

    In the ASET and RSET approach, the evacuation analysis is undertaken without exposing the population to the evolving fire atmosphere, and so the fire does not impact the evacuation dynamics in any way. In the coupled approach, the evacuating population are exposed to the developing fire hazards, which may have an impact on their performance or the decisions they make during the evacuation. Using such an analysis, it is possible to derive a more realistic estimation of evacuation times and to determine the impact of the evacuees' cumulative exposure to fire hazards i.e. number of expected fatalities and injury levels [1].

    This use case uses the stages specified in the UK Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) guidelines [2] to develop a process map that includes proposed openBIM based data sharing. 


    [1] Siddiqui AA, Ewer JA, Lawrence PJ, Galea ER, Frost IR. Building Information Modelling for performance-based Fire Safety Engineering analysis – A strategy for data sharing. J Build Eng. 2021;42(102794). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102794

    [2] RIBA. Plan of Work for Fire Safety Consultation. 2018. Available from: https://www.architecture.com/knowledge-and-resources/resources-landing-page/plan-of-work-for-fire-safety-consultation)

    Life Cycle Stages

    RIBA - plan of work

    BIM Objectives & Benefits

    1. Identify the actors and stages involved in the evacuation design phase.
    2. Identify the workflow for evacuation modelling tools.
    3. Identify data exchange requirements to carry out evacuation analysis using modelling tools.
    4. Identify current IFC support for data exchange and limitations, together with areas for improvement.

     

    Delimitation

    1. This use case is based on UK RIBA stages.
    2. Focused only on the design stages.

    Prerequisite / Framework Conditions

    • Approved Document B (AD B) [AD B is a prescriptive document that allows alternative solutions to be implemented for more complex scenarios. These alternative solutions are typically called fire engineering solutions or performance-based solutions.]
    • British Standard (BS) 7974:2001 – Application of Fire Safety Engineering principles to the Design of Buildings, code of practice [The BS 7974 is the main document that provides technical support for the development of fire engineering solutions, including human factors and computational modelling]

     

    Abbreviations

    Fire Safety Engineering (FSE)

    Occupant Movement Analysis (OMA)

    Images

    • oma_image.jpg (jpg | 612.65 KB)

    Description

    Once the data from a BIM authoring tool is imported by an evacuation modelling tool, a number of different evacuation scenarios will be conducted. The results of these simulations, along with their assumptions, are currently summarised in a report, all which should be captured in the BIM model. The tables below provide an overview of the broad data categories required.

     

     

     

    Process

    Process diagram

    Overall process

    Description

    Presenting the overall process in practice, including the involved actors and the data exchange among them during the relevant RIBA stages:

    Images
    • oma_bpmn_v4-1-openBIM-v5-RIBA.png (png | 475.67 KB)
    Files
    • oma_bpmn_v4-1-openBIM-v5-RIBA.pdf (pdf | 308.74 KB)

    RIBA - plan of work

    2 | Concept Design

    At Stage 2 work on the Concept Design in relation to fire safety is conducted.

    Performance Requirement

    Input: Briefing and feasibility studies documentation (Building type/use, egress options, number of occupants)

    Output: Risk assessment

    Images
    3 | Developed Design

    Stage 3 - Spatial Coordination. This is where the practical aspects of the concept are decided, this includes considering building regulations and legal requirements.

    Performance Requirement

    Planning application submission, including fire safety strategy report

    Images
    4 | Technical Design

    Stage 4 - technical design. This is where the design is finalised before manufacturing and construction can start.

    This includes detailed technical design advice and fire safety specification information to support design team outputs.

    Performance Requirement

    Full plans application including detailed information (drawings and specifications) on meeting building regulations including all fire safety requirements (B1 – Means of warning and escape)

    Images
    • oma_evacuation_stage2.jpg (jpg | 1,009.95 KB)
    • oma_evacuation_stage3.jpg (jpg | 1.16 MB)
    • oma_evacuation_stage4.jpg (jpg | 1.12 MB)