Logo UCM buildingSMART International
  • Aucun résultat trouvé
  • Cas d'utilisation
  • Co-Creation Space
  • Communauté
    • buildingSMART
      • buildingSMART International
      • buildingSMART Autriche
      • buildingSMART Benelux
      • buildingSMART Allemagne
      • buildingSMART Switzerland
    • Organisations
      • HSLU
    • Partenaires de collaboration
      • Entreprises
      • Associations & Institutions
      • Expert
  • fr
    • en
    • de
    • fr
  • Connexion
Emplacement
buildingSMART Switzerland Andreasstrasse 5 8050 Zurich (Switzerland)ucm@buildingsmart.ch
Société
AccueilÀ proposCommunautéFormation
Ressources
Cas d'utilisationCo-creation spaceNotes de versionFAQ
buildingSMART Logo
Copyright © 2025 buildingSMART. Tous droits réservés.
ContactDéclaration de confidentialité et de cookiesTermes et conditions
Small IconAI Chat

    Evacuation Analysis - International

    Commentaires

    Chargement des commentaires...

    PAS ENCORE INSCRIT?


    Inscrivez-vous au Service de Gestion des Cas d'Utilisation gratuitement pour commencer à créer votre premier cas d'utilisation.


    Les utilisateurs inscrits peuvent utiliser la zone de téléchargement et les fonctions de commentaire.

    Evacuation Analysis - International
    Type de Document
    Cas d'utilisation
    GUID
    C7DBA486-8E76-4007-A296-CD28EDF47D9F
    Identifiant
    -
    Phase du Cycle de Vie
    ISO 22263
    Révision
    V1.1.0
    Statut du Projet
    Approuvé
    Niveau de Maturité
    Exemple
    Publié le
    6 déc. 2021
    Dernière Modification
    4 nov. 2024
    Éditeur
    buildingSMART International
    Auteurs
    • Angelika Kneidl
    • Asim Siddiqui
    • Jimmy Abualdenien
    • Peter Lawrence
    • Rainer Könnecke
    • Timo Lehtoviita
    Accueil
    Cas d'utilisation
    Evacuation Analysis - International

    Cas d'utilisation Définition du Document

    Exigences d'échange

    Impression

    Groupe de Projet

    • Jimmy Abualdenien (Technical University of Munich (TUM))
    • Angelika Kneidl (accu:rate GmbH)
    • Rainer Könnecke (IST GmbH)
    • Peter Lawrence (University of Greenwich)
    • Timo Lehtoviita (LAB University of Applied Sciences)
    • Asim Siddiqui (University of Greenwich)
    • Peter Thompson (Autodesk)

    Droits d'auteur

    All dokuments are licensed as a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
    (Attribution-Non-Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0). Further information can be found at

    creativecommons

    Manipulation

    The documents reflect the current best practice and do not claim to be complete. They should not to be understood in the sense of a generally valid recommendation or guideline from a legal point of view. The documents are intended to support appointing and appointed parties in the application of the BIM method. The documents must be adapted to the specific project requirements in each case. The examples listed do not claim to be complete. Its information is based on findings from practical experience and is accordingly to be understood as best practice and not universally applicable. Since we are in a phase in which definitions are only emerging, the publisher cannot guarantee the correctness of individual contents.

    Résumé de la Gestion

    To plan buildings compliant with respect to occupants' safety, a performance-based analysis of the design can be conducted. For that, pedestrian simulations can be utilised. These simulations are used to check whether performance indicators are fulfilled according to regulations and establish if the building is compliant. To perform such analysis the model has to provide specific information such as geometry, population, etc.

    Description

    The normal practice in relation to fire safety in buildings is to apply a prescriptive approach. However, for more complex buildings, the prescriptive rules are not always applicable. Therefore, a performance-based approach is used, which utilises either hand calculations or computer model simulations to determine evacuation times and possible bottlenecks in the building's design. For a given scenario, performance-based analysis has to determine the Available Safe Egress Time (ASET), which needs to be greater than the Required Safe Egress Time (RSET) plus a suitable safety margin.

    • ASET (commonly determined by the time required for certain fire parameters to reach identified critical life safety conditions) is driven by the fire development and determined by a fire simulation.
    • RSET (commonly defined as the time required to complete the evacuation) is driven by human behaviour and often determined by an evacuation simulation. 

    Another approach is to use coupled fire and evacuation analysis, where the impact of fire hazards on the population is directly taken into consideration during the evacuation simulation and so RSET and ASET values are not explicitly determined. Although this approach is less common, it can provide more realistic results. 

    In the ASET and RSET approach, the evacuation analysis is undertaken without exposing the population to the evolving fire atmosphere, and so the fire does not impact the evacuation dynamics in any way. In the coupled approach, the evacuating population are exposed to the developing fire hazards, which may have an impact on their performance or the decisions they make during the evacuation. Using such an analysis, it is possible to derive a more realistic estimation of evacuation times and to determine the impact of the evacuees' cumulative exposure to fire hazards i.e. number of expected fatalities and injury levels [1].

     


    [1] Siddiqui AA, Ewer JA, Lawrence PJ, Galea ER, Frost IR. Building Information Modelling for performance-based Fire Safety Engineering analysis – A strategy for data sharing. J Build Eng. 2021;42(102794). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102794

    Phases du Cycle de Vie

    ISO 22263

    Objectifs & Avantages du BIM

    1. Identify the actors and stages involved in the evacuation analysis during the design phase.
    2. Identify the workflow for evacuation modelling tools.
    3. Identify data exchange requirements to carry out evacuation analysis using modelling tools.
    4. Identify current IFC support for data exchange and limitations, together with areas for improvement.

    Délimitation

    1. This use case examines processes across multiple countries, such as Germany and the United States.
    2. Has a specific focus on the design stages.

    Abréviations

    Fire Safety Engineering (FSE)

    Occupant Movement Analysis (OMA)

    Processus

    Diagramme de Processus

    Processus Global

    Description

    The process map of Evacuation Analysis (International) is shown below:

    Images
    Fichiers
    • oma-bpmn-evacuation-international-openBIM-v3.png (png | 391,40 KB)
    • oma-bpmn-evacuation-international-openBIM-v3.pdf (pdf | 90,94 KB)